1 2025:CGHC:60906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6519 of 2025 1 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Through Authorised Officer, Govind Vishwakarma, S/o Shiv Charan Vishwakarma, Aged About 36 Years, Office At Regional Office Ambikapur, Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector- Cum- District Magistrate Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Tehsildar, Surguja, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Surguja, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Sub Divisional Magistrate Surguja, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Sneh Singh D/o Prahlad Singh R/o Ramniwas Colony, Raj Mohini Ward, Ambikapur, Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh 7 - Manoj Bharati S/o Markanday Bharati R/o Ward No. 43, Darripara, Ambikapur, Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh 8 - Manvendra Singh Gaur S/o Roshan Singh Gaur R/o Ramniwas Colony, Raj Mohini Ward, Ambikapur, Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 15/12/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.16 11:21:01 +0530 2 “10.1 That, the records pertaining to the proceedings before the respondents may kindly be called for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondents No.2 to 5 to assist in granting the physical possession of the mortgaged properties for petitioner bank, also to conclude the proceedings under section 14 of the Act of 2002, in revenue case No.94/B-121/Year 2023-2024, with use of required force, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deemed just and fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking a direction to the Tahsildar/respondent No.2 to take decision on the pending representation dated 03.11.2025. 3. Learned State counsel submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 4. On due consideration on the submission made by learned counsel for parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents No.2 and 3 to take decision on the pending representation submitted petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram