Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61247 (CHH)

JASBIR SINGH HORA v. UMA PATEL

MAC/518/2018 · 2025-12-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 518 of 2018 Jasbir Singh Hora S/o Shri Sumer Singh Aged About 61 Years R/o Telibanda, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Uma Patel W/o Late Uddhav Kumar Aged About 30 Years R/o Bore Thana Saria, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Minor Sameer Patel S/o Late Uddhav Kumar Aged About 6 Years Through R-1 Uma Patel (Mother), R/o Bore Thana Saria, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Minor Sanskar Patel, S/o Late Uddhav Patel, Aged About 2 Years Through R-1 Uma Patel (Mother And Natural Guardian), R/o Bore Thana Saria, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Pancham Patel, S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 57 Years R/o Bore Thana Saria, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Mileetrin Bai Patel W/o Panchram, Aged About 50 Years R/o Bore Thana Saria, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Harilal Bareth, S/o Jairam, Aged About 55 Years R/o Barapipar Thana, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Ms. Shimpi Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 3 : Mr. Ishwar Jaiswal, Advocate YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.01.03 14:52:59 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Judgment on Board 15.12.2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the dispute between the parties has already been amicably settled and, therefore, he does not wish to press the present appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the claimants/respondents No. 1 to 3 concurs with the submission made on behalf of the appellant and submits that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the claimants also do not wish to press the cross-appeal. 3. In view of the submissions made on behalf of both the parties, the present appeal as well as the cross-appeal filed by the claimants stand disposed of as infructuous, the dispute having been settled between the parties. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh