Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61238 (PNJ)

RAJAN SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/28245/2025 · 2025-09-24

Subhas Mehla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-28245-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CRM-M-28245-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.09.2025 RAJAN SINGH …. PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA …. RESPONDENT CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present : Mr.H.N.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS, 2023) seeking grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 29 dated 18.02.2025 under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC, registered at Police Station DLF-1, Gurugram, District Gurugram. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioner has entered into a compromise with the respondent before the Mediation Centre of Gurugram. As per the settlement, he has paid the settled amount i.e. Rs.16,75,000/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand Only) to the complainant. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sunil Kumar and as per report of the Mediator dated 05.07.2025 Anju Goel 2025.09.26 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-28245-2025 (O&M) -2- admitted that compromise has been effected between the parties and the payment has been made to the complainant through demand draft. 5. Heard. 6. Keeping in view the contentions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer and as the offences in the present case are punishable upto 07 years, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another (2014), 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51. 7. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 24.09.2025 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anju Goel 2025.09.26 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh