Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61231 (CHH)

ANAND RAM DAYALANI v. UNION OF INDIA

WA/941/2025 · 2025-12-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60898-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 941 of 2025 Anand Ram Dayalani S/o Sundar Das Dayalani Aged About 48 Years Owner Of Land Bearing Khasra No. 572/3 (Village Beltara), R/o Flat No. A-5 Vishal Heights Mahamaya Vihar, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ...Appellant(s) versus 1. Union Of India Through The Secretary Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, New Delhi.- 110001, District New Delhi, Delhi 2. National Highway Authority Of India Through The Chairman, G-5 And 6, Sector 10, Dwarika, New Delhi., District New Delhi, Delhi 3. Chief Engineer Public Works Department National Highway Division Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Competent Authority National Highways Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For Respondents/ NHAI : Ms. Aishley Shrivastava on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate For Respondent/ UOI : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI For Respondent/ State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.12.16 10:56:30 +0530 2 Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 15/12/2025 1. Heard Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI for UOI and Ms. Aishley Shrivastava on behalf of Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate for NHAI and Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. 2. The appellant has filed this writ appeal against the order dated 25.06.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in WPC No. 4742 of 2019, by which learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner/ appellant herein. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to take recourse to law before learned Single Judge. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to law before learned Single Judge. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti