Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61229 (KAR)

SRI PRABHAKAR H CHINI S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/102419/2025 · 2025-07-23

K V Aravind, R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9119-DB WP No. 102419 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO.102419 OF 2025 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: SRI. PRABHAKAR H.CHINI S/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RETIRED ENGINEER - IN CHIEF, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, RESIDING AT PO: MUSHIGERI, TALUK: GAJENDRAGAD, DISTRICT: GADAG-582114. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH S.BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.03.2025 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI IN APPLICATION NO.10890/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAID APPLICATION NO.10890/2024 AS SOUGHT FOR BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL (ANNEXURE-B), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9119-DB WP No. 102419 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 21.07.2025 stating that in view of the subsequent Government Orders dated 05.04.2025 and 07.04.2025, the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to just exception. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE CLK CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46