Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61218 (BOM)

SHASHIKANT AMBADAS KULKARNI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/9841/2025 · 2025-10-16

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

923-WP-9841-25.odt {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 WRIT PETITION NO. 9841 OF 2025 Shashikant Ambadas Kulkarni VERSUS State Of Maharashtra And Others ...... Mr. Adinath Kuber, Advocate h/f Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for Petitioner Ms. Neha B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents No.1 to ...... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 16 OCTOBER, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Learned Advocate Mr. Adinath Kuber, Advocate holding for Mr. A.G. Talhar, seeks accommodation on the ground of personal difficulty of the Advocate on record. However, it is to be noted that the main prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the respondent authorities to take steps to decide the petitioner’s representations dated 14.07.2023, 10.01.2024, 30.09.2024, and 30.01.2025 within a stipulated period. 2. The learned AGP waives service of notice for all respondents and submits those representations would be decided within a period of four weeks from today. The said statement is taken on record as an undertaking 3. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representations submitted by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE S P Rane 2025:BHC-AUG:29846-DB