Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6121 (BOM)

VITTHAL KISHANRAO JADHAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

CA/1844/2024 · 2025-03-28

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 919(i).CA.-1844-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1844 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/1346/2024 VITTHAL KISHANRAO JADHAV VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kale Gopal D. AGP for Respondent No.2/State : Mr. S.M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.D.Soman h/f Mr. D.V. Soman … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 28th MARCH 2025 PER COURT : 1. This application is for condonation of delay of 3546 days in preferring cross-objection. 2. First Appeal is admitted and yet to be decided finally. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, I find it fit to condone the delay by imposing cost. 4. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ on condition of payment of cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid to Bar Association to be utilized for Day Care Centre. SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB.. 2025:BHC-AUG:9866