VITTHAL KISHANRAO JADHAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.
CA/1844/2024 · 2025-03-28
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6121 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6121 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 919(i).CA.-1844-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1844 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/1346/2024 VITTHAL KISHANRAO JADHAV VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kale Gopal D. AGP for Respondent No.2/State : Mr. S.M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.D.Soman h/f Mr. D.V. Soman …
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 28th MARCH 2025 PER COURT :
1. This application is for condonation of delay of 3546 days in preferring cross-objection.
2. First Appeal is admitted and yet to be decided finally.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, I find it fit to condone the delay by imposing cost.
4. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ on condition of payment of cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid to Bar Association to be utilized for Day Care Centre.
SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB.. 2025:BHC-AUG:9866