PURUSHOTTAM THAKRE v. PARDESHI SIDDHARTH KOMAL (IAS)
CONT/1415/2024 · 2025-12-10
Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61200 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61200 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:60151
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1415 of 2024 1 - Purushottam Thakre S/o Shri Devrao Thakre Aged About 45 Years R/o E - 113, Difarapara, R.D.A. Colony, Raipura, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Roshanlal Sahu S/o Shri Khublal Sahu Aged About 46 Years R/o Madhymik Shiksha Mandal Awasiya Parisar Pension Bada, Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur C.G. 3 - Kedarnath Patel S/o Shri Udayram Patel Aged About 42 Years R/o Azad Chowk, Brahmanpara, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pardeshi Siddharth Komal (IAS) Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhwan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Contemnor) 2 - Smt. Pushpa Sahu (I.A.S.) Secretary, Urban Welfare And Housing, Vallabha Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.
... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate. For Resp. No. 1 : Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Advocate. For Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order On Board 11/12/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order dated 02.08.2024 (Annexure C/1) passed by this Court in WPS No. 652/2015 has been complied with and they have tendered unconditional apology for delay in compliance of the order passed by this Court.
2. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the respondent that they have already complied with the order passed by this Court and also considering the unconditional apology tendered by them in delayed compliance of the order passed by this Court, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage, therefore, the Contempt proceeding initiated against the respondent is closed.
3. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of.
4. However, the applicants are at liberty to challenge the decision taken by the respondents. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.12 11:34:11 +0530