1 2025:CGHC:60978 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1514 of 2025 1 - Kanti Madhukar W/o Puriram Kosle Aged About 35 Years R/o - Village Dhamni, Tehsil And Police Station - Hasoud, District - Sakti (C.G.) Present Address - House No. C-9, Mopka, Gyatri Parisar, City Park, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Taniya Kumari D/o Puriram Kosle Aged About 16 Years R/o - Village Dhamni, Tehsil And Police Station - Hasoud, District - Sakti (C.G.) Present Address - House No. C-9, Mopka, Gyatri Parisar, City Park, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Prakshi Kumari D/o Puriram Kosle Aged About 15 Years R/o - Village Dhamni, Tehsil And Police Station - Hasoud, District - Sakti (C.G.) Present Address - House No. C-9, Mopka, Gyatri Parisar, City Park, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shristi Kumari D/o Puriram Kosle Aged About 14 Years R/o - Village Dhamni, Tehsil And Police Station - Hasoud, District - Sakti (C.G.) Present Address - House No. C-9, Mopka, Gyatri Parisar, City Park, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Surbhi Kumari D/o Puriram Kosle Aged About 12 Years R/o - Village Dhamni, Tehsil And Police Station - Hasoud, District - Sakti (C.G.) Present Address - House No. C-9, Mopka, Gyatri Parisar, City Park, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Nityansh Kosle S/o Puriram Kosle Aged About 5 Years R/o - Village Dhamni, Tehsil And Police Station - Hasoud, District - Sakti (C.G.) Present Address - House No. C-9, Mopka, Gyatri Parisar, City Park, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicants versus Puriram Kosle S/o Late Balaram Kosle Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bilaspur Post And Tehsil - Sarsiva, District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 For Applicant : Mr. Akash Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Aamir Khan, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 15.12.2025 1. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with following prayer: “ It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision and be pleased to set-aside the order dated 11.11.2021 passed by learned Court below for the ends of justice and may further be pleased to modify the order dated 11.11.2021 and reduce the maintenance amount, in the interest of justice. ” 2. Mr. Akash Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Aamir Khan, counsel for the applicants submits that because of some personal reasons, Mr. Aamir Khan could not appear in the present matter to argue his case. 3. On the pointed query being made from Mr. Akash Sharma, Advocate, that as the four other counsels namely, Mr. Shubham Patel, Mr. Ramakant Patel, Md. Faruq Azam and Dr. Sitara Khan, whose name are mentioned in the cause list and they have signed the vakalatnama, why are they not present to argue to matter, then the applicant’s counsel is unable the explain also. 4. The Registry has also reported that the present revision suffers from various defaults, but till date the defaults have not been removed. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of the instant revision, with the liberty to life afresh after removing the defaults. 6. Prayer is allowed. 7. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicants to file afresh after removing the defaults. 3 8. Let a certified copy of this order be transmitted to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar