- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15726 WP No. 100424 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100424 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: PRABHAVATI GANESH PUJARI SISTER OF AMAGOND CTP-3930 AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O KPC COLONY VTC MATHIKAL SUB DIST: HOSANAGARA, DISTRICT: SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA-577452. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HALEEMA BEGUM, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. 2. CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRL PRISON BELAGAVI-591108. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 THAT PETITIONER’S BROTHER AMAGOND CTP- 3930 CONVICTED FOR LIFE SINCE 8 YEARS 11 MONTHS PRESENTLY LODGED IN RESPONDENT NO.2’S CENTRAL PRISON BELAGAVI MAY BE ENLARGED/RELEASED ON GENERAL PAROLE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MOTHER ILLNESS, HIS PRESENCE IS ESSETIAL TO PROVIDE PHYSICAL SUPPORT DURING THIS CHALLENGING TIME AND TO BARE ALL THE EXPENSES FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15726 WP No. 100424 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. This Court, by order dated 15.10.2025, had passed the following direction: “Finally, 10 days’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, showing indulgence as it was a common object that is passed. In the event objections are not complied with, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench earlier, the petitions could be dismissed without showing any indulgence to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, as this would be the last straw of opportunity to comply. List this matter on 29.10.2025. Interim order subsisting, if any, is extended till the next date of hearing.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 200