Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61157 (ALL)

SARITA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/7085/2025 · 2025-05-19

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84686 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7085 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarita Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for following relief: "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents the Pay Grade of Rupees 2800/- to the petitioner as being paid to other similarly placed Health Workers, who were appointed on or before 01.12.2011 with arrears." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical set of facts, the matter being Writ - A No.- 12730 of 2023 (Savita Devi and 9 others v. State of U.P. and 2 others) has come to be disposed of by this Court on 10.10.2023 and hence the petitioner is also entitled to the similar relief. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner may be directed to file representation afresh before the competent authority annexing therewith a copy of the judgment of this Court in the case of Savita Devi (supra) which may be decided by respondent No.- 2 in accordance with law. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make fresh representation regarding her claim within a period of four weeks from today before the competent authority-respondent No.- 2 and in the event such representation is filed as directed herein above, the same shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible preferably within a further period of two months. 6. It is made clear that in the event respondent No.- 2 who is competent authority in the matter finds the petitioner to be entitled to relief in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Savita Devi (supra), the benefit shall be immediately inferred upon the petitioner within a further period of six months. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Atmesh Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad