1 2025:CGHC:60513-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 182 of 2024 1 - Ms. Shrishti Sharma D/o Late Shrikant Sharma, Aged About 34 Years R/o 20/7, Phase-Ii, Wood Island Society, Amleshwar, Tahsil - Patan, District Durg (C.G.) In The Cause Title Of The Order Mentioned As- Mrs. Shrishti Sharma (Chakravarti) W/o Ankit Chatkavarti, Aged About 32 Years R/o Mahamaya Road, Kumhari, Ward No. 10, Shankar Nagar, Post And P.S. - Kumhari, District Durg (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Ankit Chakravarti S/o Vasu Chakravarti, Aged About 37 Years R/o Mig-6, Sector-3, Shankar Nagar, Post- Shankar Nagar, P.S. Khamardih, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate along with appellant. For Respondent : Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal, Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Judgment on Board Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 12/12/2025 1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2004 by the Family Court, Durg whereby the permanent alimony claimed by the appellant has been denied. 2. By the settlement deed entered into between the parties on 02.12.2024, the respondent was directed to pay an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- towards the permanent alimony. It is stated by the counsel for the respondent that out of Rs.25,00,000/-, an 2 amount of Rs.15,00,000/- has already been paid to the appellant. Today it is stated by counsel for the respondent that he wants to finalize the payment of remaining amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and thus handed over the Demand Draft No. 626073- 492012025-208697-16 dated 02.12.2025 drawn on Bank of Baroda in favour of the appellant who is present in person in the Court itself. The appellant in person has accepted the bank draft. 3. The matter has been settled in the Mediation Centre and the report of which is part of the record. Accordingly, as per settlement entered into the Mediation Centre where the dispute between the parties has been resolved and entire settlement amount of Rs.25 Lakh has been paid by respondent to appellant. 4. Accordingly, impugned judgment and decree with respect to denial of the permanent alimony stands set aside. Rest of the condition of decree is to remain intact. 5. Let a decree be drawn accordingly and mediation report be made part of it. No cost. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Parul PARUL MITTAL Digitally signed by PARUL MITTAL Date: 2025.12.12 17:40:09 +0530