Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6112 (UTT)

MANNOON AHMAD ALIAS BABU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/764/2025 · 2025-05-14

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3883 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 14th MAY, 2025 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO.764 of 2025 Mannoon Ahmad alias Babu ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mrs. Lata Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. This is the First Bail Application. 2. The applicant- Mannoon Ahmad alias Babu is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.47 of 2025, registered at Police Station Pulbhatta, District Udham Singh Nagar under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11(1) of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007. 3. As per the First Information Report, on a secret information, the police party raided the spot and recovered 12 kg of beef and other articles on 30.03.2025. The police party observed that there were 1 2025:UHC:3883 two persons on the spot. The police party arrested the present applicant, whereas co-accused Amil alias Guddu managed to escape from the spot. 4. Heard Mrs. Lata Negi, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for State. 5. Mrs. Lata Negi, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. Despite sufficient time and opportunity, the police did not call any independent person as witness. Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents, and, he is in judicial custody since 31.03.2025. 6. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General, has opposed the bail application orally. 7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. 8. The Bail Application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant – Mannoon Ahmad alias Babu be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the 2 2025:UHC:3883 like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:14.05.2025 Neha 3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b0 1be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960BFE64D81 9EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.05.14 19:29:16 +05'30'