{1} cp304-24.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.304 OF 2024 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 32 OF 2016 Hemraj Ravindra Patil PETITIONER VERSUS Ranjeetsingh Deol and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Sandip R. Sapkal, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent - State ....... [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 14 th OCTOBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. By order dated 12th August, 2025, Director of Education (Primary) was directed to pass fresh orders with regard to the absorption of the Petitioner. 2. The Director has taken a decision that the Petitioner could not be absorbed in the service. Affidavit to that effect is filed stating that a Criminal Case is lodged against the Petitioner. 3. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner makes a grievance that, the order is arbitrary and unreasonable. 4. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, the {2} cp304-24.doc Petitioner may avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. 5. As the decision is taken in the case of the Petitioner, we are of the view that the order is complied with. 6. The Contempt Petition is, therefore, disposed of. [ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/cp304-24.doc