121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT HISHAM SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR Present Mr. for the * SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA 1. Notice of motion. 2. Mr. behalf of respondents. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties are present case stands covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in a bunch of Writ Petitions in which lead case was “Mahabir Singh Tanwar 24.04.2025, in which this Court has held as under: “9. the same would have no impediment in disposing of all petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme Court on 20.02.2025 in Miscellaneous application Dairy No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscel applications titled as "Union of India and another versus M.Siddaraj (supra). 10. allow them in the same terms as above and with further directions to the Administration IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14917 Date of Decision: HISHAM SINGH AND OTHERS V STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for both the parties are present case stands covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in a bunch of Writ Petitions in which lead case was Mahabir Singh Tanwar Vs. State of Haryana and others in which this Court has held as under: “9. We have noticed the aforesaid submissions. However, the same would have no impediment in disposing of all petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme Court on 20.02.2025 in Miscellaneous application Dairy No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscel applications titled as "Union of India and another versus M.Siddaraj (supra). 10. We, therefore, dispose of all these writ petitions and allow them in the same terms as above and with further directions to the Administration-respondents to pas IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 14917-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22ND of May, 2025 ..…...Petitioner(s) V/s. .....Respondent(s) SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Advocate, Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts notice on Learned counsel for both the parties are ad idem that the present case stands covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in a bunch of Writ Petitions in which lead case was CWP-14627-2024 titled as State of Haryana and others” decided on in which this Court has held as under:- We have noticed the aforesaid submissions. However, the same would have no impediment in disposing of all these writ petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme Court on 20.02.2025 in Miscellaneous application Dairy No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscellaneous applications titled as "Union of India and another versus We, therefore, dispose of all these writ petitions and allow them in the same terms as above and with further respondents to pass specific Suresh Kumar 2025.05.23 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14917-2025 (O&M) orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would accordingly required to be adjusted and released. 11. any policy decision which the State Government may take with respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of service in their last year of tenure.” 4. In mutandis in terms of the CWP-14627-2024 5. Al accordingly. May 22, 2025 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned Whether Reportable 2025 (O&M) p. 2 orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would accordingly required to be adjusted and released. 11. The State authorities shall also take into consideration any policy decision which the State Government may take with respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of service in their last year of tenure.” In view thereto, we dispose of the present Writ Petition in terms of the order dated 24.04.2025 2024 and connected cases. All pending applications in this [SANJEEV [MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA 2025 Whether speaking / reasoned : Whether Reportable : orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would be accordingly required to be adjusted and released. The State authorities shall also take into consideration any policy decision which the State Government may take with respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of service in their last year of the present Writ Petition mutatis 24.04.2025 passed by this Court in pending applications in this case are dismissed of SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA] JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA] JUDGE : Yes / No : Yes / No Suresh Kumar 2025.05.23 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document