Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61099 (MAD)

A.VIRUSHABADOSS v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF

WP/13592/2014 · 2025-03-10

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.13592 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.13592 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 A.Virushabadoss .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome Highways, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The District Registrar (Administration), District Registrar Office, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 3.The Joint Sub-Registrar (No.2), Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 4.Uma Maheswari 5.Nithyakalyani 6.Prabavathy 7.Durasami Reddyiar 8.K.S.Ramesh 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13592 of 2014 9.Sugumar Reddiar 10.V.S.Jeyashankar 11.V.Kalanidhi 12.Thamilarasi 13.The Superintendent of Police, Villuppuram. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3970/A1/2013 dated 20.01.2014 of 2nd respondent and consequently direct the 13th respondent to investigate the petitioner complaint dated 22.03.2013. For Petitioner : No appearance For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader O R D E R This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2014 and for a consequential direction to the 13th respondent to investigate the complaint given by the petitioner and to take action. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13592 of 2014 2.Heard the learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3. 3.The impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2014 does not require any interference, since there is no power available for the registering authority to cancel any registered document. In so far as the direction sought for to the 13th respondent to enquire the complaint, the complaint is more than 12 years since it was given and nothing may survive at this length of time. 4.In the result, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 10.03.2025 krk Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13592 of 2014 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. krk To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome Highways, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The District Registrar (Administration), District Registrar Office, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 3.The Joint Sub-Registrar (No.2), Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Villuppuram. W.P.No.13592 of 2014 10.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis