Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61098 (CHH)

RAJESH KUMAR ADITYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13825/2025 · 2025-12-10

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60279 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13825 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar Aditya S/o Balmukund Aditya Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Rahas Chowk, Nagar Panchayat Bhatghaon, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies Consumer Protection, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Collector District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. Deputy / Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Societies, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Chief Executive Officer District Co-Operative Central Bank Limited, Raipur, District: Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Branch Manager District Co-Operative Central Bank Limited, Branch Dhangaon, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 6. Authorized Officer / President Prathmik Krisi Shakh Sahkari Samiti Maruyadit Bhatgaon Reg. No. 1416, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lav Sharma, PL For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Seema Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.12 10:45:34 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 11/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court with liberty to raise a dispute before the Registrar, Cooperative Societies. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. It is made clear that if the petitioner raises a dispute before the Registrar, Cooperative Societies within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, neither the authority nor the respondents will take plea of limitation and the authority will decide the case on its own merit, in accordance with law. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh