Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61091 (CHH)

AJAY KUMAR PAIKARA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8102/2024 · 2025-12-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60760 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Judge- Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Sunil Otwani, Senior Advocate WPS No. 8102 of 2024 Ajay Kumar Paikara S/o Shri Harihar Singh Paikara Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Sub Engineer, Office Of The Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources Sub Division No. 1, Katghora, District Korba, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, C.G. 2 - The Engineer -In-Chief Water Resources Department Shivnath Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, C.G. 3 - The Executive Engineer Water Resources Division, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer Water Resources Sub Division No. 1, Katghora District Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioenr : Mr. Ajay Kumar Paikra, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. D.R. Minj, GA AWARD (Passed on 13.12.2025) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 15/03/2024 whereby he has been transferred from District Korba to District Jagdalpur. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.12.19 11:24:13 +0530 2 2. Today, both the parties filed compromise application stating that the petitioner has joined at the new place of posting, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. Hence both the parties compromised the dispute amicably and as such nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 3. The contesting parties to this petition have amicably settled/compromised the dispute. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties. 4. A copy of this docket/compromise arrived at by the parties be made part of this record. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Sunil Otwani) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur ashu