BASANAGOUDA S/O HIREBHEEMANAGOUDA TANAKANAKAI v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND
MFA/100561/2022 · 2025-01-29
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6109 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6109 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100561 OF 2022 (LAC)
BETWEEN
1 .
1.
1A. BASANAGOUDA S/O HIREBHEEMANAGOUDA TANAKANAKAI SINCE DECEASED HIS LRS.
ANDAMMA W/O BASANAGOUDA TUNAKANKAI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
HEMANNA S/O BASANAGOUDA TUNAKANKAI AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC.AGRI, R/O.BEWOOR, TQ.YALABURGA, DIST.KOPPAL,
1B.
BASAVVA W/O SOMAPPA BEWOOR AGE: 56 YEARS OCC.AGRI, R/O.BEWOOR, TQ.YALABURGA, DIST.KOPPAL,
1C. SHANKARGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA TANAKANKAI AGE: 55 YEARS OCC.AGRIL, R/O.BEWOOR, TQ.YALABURGA, DIST. KOPPAL.
1D. AMARAVVA W/O SHANKARGOUDA TEGGINAMANI AGE: 50 YEARS OCC.AGRIL, R/O.TURUMARI, TQ.HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKOT.
1E. SHIVASHANKARGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA TANAKANKAI AGE: 48 YEARS OCC.AGRIL, R/O.BEWOOR, TQ.YALABURGA,
2 DIST.KOPPAL.
1F. ERANAGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA TANAKANKAI AGE: 40 YEARS OCC.AGRIL, R/O.BEWOOR, TQ.YALABURGA, DIST. KOPPAL.
1G. BHIMANGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA TANAKANKAI AGE: 38 YEARS OCC.AGRIL, R/O.BEWOOR, TQ.YALABURGA, DIST. KOPPAL. ...APPELLANTS (By SRI : JAGADISH PATIL)
AND 1 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KOPPAL.
2 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, YALBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL. …RESPONDENTS
* * * * *
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Sec.54(1) of Land Acquisition Act,1894, against the Judgment and Award dated 16.12.2015 passed in LAC No.5/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Yelburga.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
3
O R D E R
Two weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE
//COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 29.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 100561 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated
29.01.2025.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
T By: vg
C By: sdp