Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61065 (ALL)

AJAY PAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/16312/2025 · 2025-05-20

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85110-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16312 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Rai,Om Prakash Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. The prayer made in the instant petition is for issuing a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.09.2024 in respect of his claim under the Scheme of Gramin Abadi (Management and Regularization) Rules, 2011 and allot 10% abadi land to him. 2.Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent, Development Authority, submits that 10% developed abadi is to be given to the affected farmers on basis of the Full Bench judgment in Gajraj and others Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2011 (11) ADJ 1. She submits that the claim under the Scheme of Gramin Abadi (Management and Regularization) Rules, 2011 is only for lease back of the abadi area. The petitioner has mixed up the two claims. 3. Having regard to the rival submissions, we dispose of the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation specifying the provision under which the claim is being made. In case, any such representation is filed along with true attested copy of the instant order within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided by the respondent, Development Authority, by a speaking order within next eight weeks. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Mukesh Kr. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad