1 2025:CGHC:60461 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6341 of 2025 1 - M/s Pc World, A Proprietorship Firm Through Its Proprietor Mr. Rahul Kakwani, S/o Shri Suresh Kakwani, Aged About 36 Years R/o Capital Homes, House No. 212, Vidhansabha Road, Saddu, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Having Its Registered Office At Shop No. 5, Block-B, Ground Floor, Nagdev Plaza, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 492001 ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur 2 - District Collector Kondagaon, District Kondagaon (C.G.) 3 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Nirman Samiti, Kondagaon, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, District Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Aishwarya Dubey, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Upasna Mehta, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 12 /12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present writ petition. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ./order/direction directing the Respondents to act upon the representations of 2 the petitioner Annexure P/5 9 (colly) and the legal notice Annexure P/6. 10.3 Award costs of the present petition in favour of the petitioner; 10.4 Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice .” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner pursuant to the supply order issued in his favour has supplied the IT equipments, Security Surveillance systems and Electrical Equipments to the various departments of the State of Chhattisgarh, however, entire payment towards the goods supplied has not been paid. Petitioners approached the authorities several times and lastly, he has submitted a representation before Respondent No. 3 on 26.05.2025 and 17.10.2025, however, till date, no decision has been taken and therefore, direction be issued to the Respondent No. 3 to take decision on the pending representation expeditiously, within specified time frame. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that the grievance of the petitioner is against the Respondent No. 3 for whom she is not appearing. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the parties, limited prayer made by the counsel for petitioner seeking direction to the Respondent No. 3 to consider and take decision on the pending representations, without commenting anything on the merits of the claim of petitioner, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondent No. 3 to take decision on the pending representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of the order. 3 6. Petitioner will be at liberty to submit afresh representation, if he so desire and if such a representation is submitted along with this order, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the said representation along with pending representation as directed above. 7. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY