Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61024 (BOM)

THE OFFICER COMMANDING THE STATION AND PRESIDENT, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS v. MANNALAL HIRALAL AGRAWAL LRS SURYAKALABAI AND OTHERS

CA/8574/2025 · 2025-08-12

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 974(i).CA-8574-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 974 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8574 OF 2025 IN SA/212/2013 THE OFFICER COMMANDING THE STATION AND PRESIDENT, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS VERSUS MANNALAL HIRALAL AGRAWAL LRS SURYAKALABAI AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr.A.V.Soman h/f.Mr. Soman D.V. Advocate for Respondent No.2 to 9 in SA :Mr.P.K.Lakhotiya (Through V.C) … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 12.08.2025 PER COURT : . Heard both sides. 2. Present application is for condonation of delay and bringing legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.4/ Mulidevi Laxminarayan Kagliwal and Respondent No.7/Subhash Nandkishor Kagliwal on record. 3. The legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.4 is already on record who is Respondent No.2/Nandkishor Laxminarayan Kagliwal. The legal heirs of Respondent No.7/Subhash Nandkishor Kagliwal needs to be brought on record as shown in title clause of the application. There is no serious dispute for the application in 2025:BHC-AUG:21962 2 974(i).CA-8574-2025.odt question. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, delay needs to be condoned and legal heirs of Respondent No.7/Subhash Nandkishor Kagliwal needs to be brought on record. 5. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..