Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61016 (PNJ)

SURJEET SINGH @ LUDHAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/30838/2024 · 2025-09-08

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-30838-2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 217(i) AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30838-2024 Date of decision: 08.09.2025 SURJEET SINGH @ LUDHAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. L.S.Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 25 dated 11.03.2023 under Sections 22 and 29 of NDPS Act registered at Police Station Moonak District Sangrur. 2. Vide order dated 13.02.2025 the petitioner has been released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner remained in custody for 01 year 11 months and 4 days. 4. Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate of the petitioner in the Court today and the same is taken on record. He further submits that out of 16 cited prosecution witnesses, only 02 witnesses have been examined so far. 5. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition for regular bail is allowed and the interim order dated Renu Rawat 2025.09.10 16.42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30838-2024 2 13.02.2025 is hereby made absolute on the same bail bonds and surety bonds as furnished by the petitioner vide order dated 13.02.2025. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 08.09.2025 (H.S.GREWAL) renu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.09.10 16.42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document