Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61012 (CHH)

VIJAY DIWAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/10334/2025 · 2025-12-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61068 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10334 of 2025 1 - Vijay Diwan S/o Dhansingh Diwan Aged About 27 Years R/o Sitlawand Maripara, P.S. Bhanpuri, District- Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Dumar Kashyap S/o Bharosha Ram Kashyap Aged About 27 Years R/o Sitlawand Maripara, P.S. Bhanpuri, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Bhanpuri District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Abhishekn Nirala, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 15/12/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 connection with Crime No. 121/2025 registered at Police Station Bhanpuri District- Bastar (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the Police of Police Station Bhanpuri District- Bastar seized total 35.640 liters of Goa Whisky liquor from the possession of the applicants, which led to the registration of alleged offence against the applicants and subsequently, the applicants were arrested. Hence, the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case and 35.640 liters of Goa Whiskey liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicants. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He also submits that the applicants have no criminal antecedent, the applicants are in jail since 12.10.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicants. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court and also endorsed the said submission that the applicants have no criminal antecedents. He further submits that 35.640 bulk liters of Goa Whiskey liquor 3 was recovered from the possession of the applicants, therefore, the applicants are not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicants and the fact that the applicants have no criminal antecedents, the applicants are in jail since 12.10.2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed, further the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, as such, this Court is of the view that the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 8. Let the applicants - Vijay Diwan and Dumar Kashyap, involved in Crime No. 121/2025 registered at Police Station Bhanpuri District- Bastar (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse 4 of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law. 9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil