Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61010 (CHH)

SRISHTI KAUSHIK v. BUDHRAM KENWAT

MAC/30/2021 · 2025-12-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60804 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Judge: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Member : Mr. Sunil Otwani, Sr. Advocate MAC No. 30 of 2021 1 - Srishti Kaushik D/o Late Sitaram Kaushik Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Sandipani Nursing College, Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Akash Kaushik S/o Late Sitaram Kaushik Aged About 17 Years Applicant No. 02 Is Minor Through The Sister (Natural Guardian) Srishti Kaushik, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Sandipani Nursing College, Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Varsha Kaushik D/o Late Sitaram Kaushik Aged About 15 Years Applicant No. 03 Is Minor Through The Sister (Natural Guardian) Srishti Kaushik, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Sandipani Nursing College, Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Budhram Kenwat S/o Latelram Kenwat Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Gidhauri, Ward No. 02, Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ......(Driver Of The Vehicle Hiwa No. C. G. 10 M-0261) 2 2 - Harishchandra Soni S/o Bhauram Soni R/o Ward No. 07/09, House No. 807, Near Anganbadi Kendra -01, Omnagar, Jarhabhatha, Bilaspur Police Station Civil Line, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh .......(Owner Of The Vehicle Hiwa No. C. G. 10/m/0261 3 - Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, 2nd Floor, Chhattisgarh Plaza, Agrasen Chowk, Bilaspur Police Station Civil Line, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh .......(Insurer Of The Vehicle Hiwa No. C. G. 10/m/0261 ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Shri Anand Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent No.3/ Insurance Company : Shri Utsav Mahiswar, Advocate AWARD (Passed on 13th December 2025) The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably and voluntarily settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to the said compromise and hence it is acceptable. 2. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties and order that the respondent No.3/New India Assurance Company Ltd. shall pay Rs. 6,90,000/- (Rupees Six lacs Ninety Thousand Only) to the claimant/appellants by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order. In case the amount is not paid SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.12.18 11:57:41 +0530 3 within stipulated time then the interest @ 6% per annum from the date of passing of this compromise award shall also be payable till its realization. 3. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Sunil Otwani) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspurpy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its rec nand a copy of the award passed today, forthwith. SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.12.18 11:57:03 +0530