Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11808 WP No. 101613 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 101613 OF 2014 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. MOHINI W/O. KRISHNA NAIK AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: ANGANVADI HELPER, R/O. SHALEHITTLA, MAVINKURVA, TQ: HONNAVARA (UK).
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UTTAR KANNADA, KARWAR.
2.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF WOMAN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, UTTAR KANNADA, KARWAR.
3.
SMT. SAROJA RAMCHANDRA GOUDA AGE: ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI KARYAKARTE, R/O. SHALEHITTLA, MAVINKURVA, TQ: HONNAVARA (UK). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK T.KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. V.G.BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH UNSIGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 DATED 10.12.2013 BEARING NO.G¤PÁ/ªÀÄ.ªÀÄ.CE./ CA.¸À/DAiÉÄÌ/vÀqÉ/13-14 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11808 WP No. 101613 of 2014
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: i) Issue writ of certiorari and quash unsigned order passed by the Respondent No.2 dated 10/12/2013 bearing to UNiKaa / Ma.Ma.AE / Am.Sa / Aayke / Tade / 13-14 vide Annexure-D. ii] Issue any other order/writ to which the petitioners are entitled for in the present set of facts and circumstances.
2. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, since subsequent to the impugned order dated 10.12.2023, the 2nd respondent has passed two other orders dated 25.01.2014, nothing further survives in the present petition and the same is disposed of, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as available in law including filing of the fresh petition.
3. Subject to the aforesaid directions and liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner, petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
EM, CT:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9