Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61000 (CHH)

HAIDAR AALAM v. VIJAY KUMAR DANSENA

SA/720/2025 · 2025-12-14

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60926 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 720 of 2025 1 - Haidar Aalam S/o Mo Abdul Sattar Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Darogamuda Tahsil And Dist- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Vijay Kumar Dansena S/o Late Onkar Prasad Dansena Aged About 49 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tahsil And Dist- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Narbadibai D/o Late Onkar Prasad Dansena, W/o Gangadhar Dansena Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Bhata, Tahsil- Dabhra, Dist- Janjgir- Champa C.G. (Now District Sakti C.G.) 3 - Kumaribai D/o Onkar Prasad Dansena, W/o Antram Dansena Aged About 53 Years R/o Village- Regda, Tehsil And Dist- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Tirithbai D/o Late Onkar Prasad Dansena, W/o Lilambar Prasad Dansena Aged About 51 Years R/o Village- Khemaroad Tahsil- Shakti, Dist- Shakti (C.G.) 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Prathaysh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Ritesh Giri, PL PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.12.15 15:56:19 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 15/12/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition to file a better constituted Petition in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the other side would not oppose the said prayer. 3. In view of the aforesaid, this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to file the said Petition in accordance with the provisions of the Limitation Act. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka