Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60990 (CHH)

NEERAJ KUMAR VAISHNAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2809/2022 · 2025-12-11

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60682 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2809 of 2022 1 - Neeraj Kumar Vaishnav S/o Shri Dani Das Vaishnav Aged About 30 Years R/o Village - Damakheda, Block - Simga, District - Balodabazar (Chhattisgarh), District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary General Administration Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Social Welfare Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Social Welfare Department, Mana Camp, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shri Rajesh Tiwari Joint Director Social Welfare Department, Mana Camp, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. GA For Respondent NO. 4 : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Digitally signed by HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Date: 2025.12.15 16:50:48 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 12.12.2025 1. This matter was called on 05.12.2025 but none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. Today, matter was called again and none appeared for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that a stranger has challenged the regularization order of the respondent No. 4 and during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent No. 4 has also retired, thus writ petition has become infructuous. 3. As no representation is made, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge H.ANSARI