Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60982 (KAR)

SHRI. SHIVANAND S/O. CHANNAVEERAPPA KAMBAR v. SMT. PARVATI W/O. VIRUPAXI SAMPAGAVI

MFA/101705/2021 · 2025-08-29

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11063 MFA No. 101705 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101705 OF 2021 (MV-D) BETWEEN: SHRI. SHIVANAND S/O. CHANNAVEERAPPA KAMBAR, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SAMPAGOAN TAL. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. GEETHA K M, ADV) AND: 1. SMT. PARVATI W/O. VIRUPAXI SAMPAGAVI AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O. SAMPAGAON, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. SHRI. RAMLING PARAPPA JUTTANAVAR AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE R/O. SAMPAGAON, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI. 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., RAMADEV GALLI, BELAGAVI. (INSURER OF MOTOR CYCLE BEARING NO.KA-23/H-5206) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAVEEN R. MELINAMANI AND SRI. NAGARAJ J APPANNANAVAR, ADVS FOR R1 & R2, SRI. N.R. KUPPELUR, ADV FOR3) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.08.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.2011/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDL. MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF Rs.2,40,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALISATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Date: 2025.09.01 14:33:37 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11063 MFA No. 101705 of 2021 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal. 2. It is stated that on instruction, the appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal, and desires to withdraw the appeal for some personal reasons. 3. The memo is placed on record. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The amount in deposit be transmitted to the Tribunal concerned forthwith. 6. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A’s, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are disposed of. SD/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE MBS CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33