Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60977 (CAL)

DEBABRATA CHAKRABORTY v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/17413/2025 · 2025-12-22

Kausik Chanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 15 22.12.2025 (Item No.157 ) (AB) W.P.A. 17413 of 2025 Debabrata Chakraborty VS The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Debabrata Ray Mr. Gazi Faruquq Hossain Ms. Sarbani Mukhopadhyay …. For the petitioner Mr. Vimal Kumar Shahi, Ld. AGP (VC) Ms. Susmita Chatterjee …. For the State Mr. Partha Sarathi Mondal Ms. Tethi Sarkar …. For respondent nos. 8-15 & 17-21 The petitioner alleges that unauthorized construction has been carried out at the instance of Respondent Nos. 8 to 15 and 17 to 21. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, in the course of such construction, land belonging to the petitioner has been encroached upon. It is further alleged that the construction has been raised without conversion of the character of the land and that the private respondents have no right, title, or interest in the land in question. This Court, in the present writ petition, is concerned only with the issue as to whether the building in question has been constructed pursuant to a sanctioned plan. The questions of alleged encroachment and the respective right, title, and interest of the parties cannot be adjudicated in writ 2 jurisdiction. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court for adjudication of those issues. Learned advocate appearing for the private respondents has produced a copy of the sanctioned building plan before this Court. Let the same be taken on record. A copy of the sanctioned plan has been handed over to learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, there is no justification to keep the present writ petition pending. This order shall not preclude the petitioner from instituting an appropriate civil suit or taking any other remedy available in law for challenging the sanctioned plan. Accordingly, WPA 17413 of 2025 is dismissed. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)