SATISH KUMAR SAROTARI AND OTHERS v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NAGROTA BAGWAN AND ANOTHER
CWP/305/2020 · 2025-03-21
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6097 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6097 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 305 of 2020
Decided on 21st March 2025 Satish Kumar Sarotari and others
…Petitioners Versus Municipal Council Nagrota Bagwan and others
…Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for respondents No.1.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has handed over the copy of documents, in terms whereof, the plan of the petitioners has been sanctioned and completion certificate-cum- occupancy certificate have also been given, the same are ordered to be taken on record. He submits that in the light of these developments, the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
2
2.
The petition is allowed to be withdrawn as prayed for. It goes without saying that either in the light of the fresh developments, the orders impugned by way of this writ petition become otiose and shall be deemed to be ineffective for all intends and purposes. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
March 21, 2025 (Vinod)