HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2070 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Mr. Ashish Chandra Nishad, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Stamp reporter has reported laches of 2711 days in filing the instant petition. 3. There is no satisfactory explanation for filing the petition after about eight years from the date of the order passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation arising out of proceeding under Section 9 of the U.P.C.H. Act. 4. Petitioners were not party before consolidation authorities, as such, petitioners have no right to challenge the order passed by the consolidation authorities. 5. The writ petition is misconceived and dismissed accordingly. September 9, 2025 Vandana Y. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Kesarwani, Arvind Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Pushpa Devi And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad