Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60963 (PNJ)

DESH RAJ CHAUHAN v. UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRM-M/28605/2025 · 2025-05-23

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116 DESH RAJ CHAUHAN UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh. MANISHA BATRA After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly 23.05.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: DESH RAJ CHAUHAN Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to seek alternate remedy in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.28605 of 2025 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 …. Petitioner UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner the present petition with liberty to seek alternate remedy (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner the present petition with liberty to seek alternate remedy Jyoti 2025.05.23 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document