IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103001 OF 2024 (MV) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NOORJANABI W/O HASANASAB GUDAGI, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O: KUSUGAL VILLAGE, TQ. HUBBALLI. 2. KUM. DAVALBI D/O HASANASAB GUDAGI, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O: KUSUGAL VILLAGE, TQ. HUBBALLI. 3. KUM. ASLAM S/O HASANASAB GUDAGI, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O: KUSUGAL VILLAGE, TQ. HUBBALLI. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.N. BADIGER, AND SRI. S.D. NARAGUND, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SRI. JYOTEPPA S/O TIMMAPPA NARAGUND, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE WORK, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, TQ. HUBBALLI. 2. SMT. SUNKAVVA W/O JYOTEPPA NARGUND, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, ROOPA PATIL Digitally signed by ROOPA PATIL Date: 2025.06.15 20:10:45 -0300 2 KESHWAPUR, TQ. HUBBALLI. 3. SMT. LAXMI W/O MANJUNATH NARAGUND, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, TQ. HUBBALLI. 4. KUM. DIVYA D/O MANJUNAHT NARAGUND, AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, TQ. HUBBALLI. 5. KUM. PADMAVATI D/O MANJUNATH NARAGUND, AGE: 11 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, TQ. HUBBALLI. 6. KUM VENKATESH S/O MANJUNATH NARAGUND, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, TQ. HUBBALLI. (THE RESPONDENT NO. 4 TO 6 ARE MINORS AND MINORS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO. 3 SMT. LAXMI W/O MANJUNATH NARGUND, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: H.NO. 25, IDIARA NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, TQ: HUBBALLI.) ... RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and Award dated 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 passed in MVC No.84/2018 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional M.A.C.T. Hubballi. 3 This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 07.04.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 103001 of 2024 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 19.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: gtb C By: lh