Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60928 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, SRI PARASHURAM SANSKRIT MAHAVIDYALAYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/7071/2025 · 2025-07-15

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114728 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7071 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management, Sri Parashuram Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Avneesh Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to pass an appropriate order or decision on the representations moved by the petitioner vide dated 27.09.2024 and 19.04.2025 (annexed as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition) pertaining to appointment and payment of salary to the Principal of the College;" 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2, the Chancellor, Sanpurnanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Varanasi, Rajbhawan, U.P. Lucknow and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondent and Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit, but have not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent and Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondent and counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is hereby provided to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad