Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60904 (PNJ)

PARVEEN KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5289/2025 · 2025-05-26

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRWP-5289-2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 PARVEEN KUMAR ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr.Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** H.S.GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for issuance of direction to official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of gangster namely Neeraj Faridpuria and also from his partners as they are continuously threatening the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said gangster and his partners are demanding ransom amounting to Rs.1 crore and they have also attacked on the shop of the petitioner and fired about 80 rounds of gunshot. The petitioner has got registered three FIRs bearing No.55 dated 26.01.2024 under Sections 506, 386 of the IPC, FIR No.155 dated 29.03.2024 under Sections 148, 149, 452, 427, 285, 307, 212, 224, 186 and 120-B of the IPC, 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act and FIR No.408 dated 21.08.2024 under Sections 114(4), 368(4), 351(2) for the said incident but they have not been arrested till POONAM RATHORE 2025.05.28 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRWP-5289-2025 -2- date. He further prays that strict action be taken against the abovesaid gangster and his partners. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On asking of the Court, Ms.Ankita Ahuja, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Palwal, to assess the threat perception of the petitioner and thereafter provide him adequate security. In case, any application for armed licence is made, the same may also be considered positively. (H.S.GREWAL) May 26, 2025 JUDGE poonam Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2025.05.28 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh