Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.11895 of 2024 T. Shyam Sundar Subudhi ..... Petitioner
Represented By Adv. - Ramachandra Panigrahy -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Party
Represented By Adv. – Ms. S.Nayak, A.S.C.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 03.01.2025
Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the meantime investigation has been concluded and the final charge sheet has been filed. He further submitted that the name of the petitioner does not find place in the charge sheet.
3. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that there is no apprehension of arrest since the petitioner has not been named in the charge sheet.
4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands
disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
(A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Rubi