- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13275 WP No. 145807 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 145807 OF 2020 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. TRIVENI KOM LATE KALANAYAK, AGE: 29 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.43, KANDIKERI TANDA, KANDAHATTI, TQ: HARAPANHALLI, DIST: BALLARI-583131. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDA, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BALLARY, TQ & DIST: BALLARI-583103. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA-PANCHAYAT, BALLARI, TQ. & DIST: BALLARI-583104. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13275 WP No. 145807 of 2020 WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT, BALLARI, TQ & DIST. BALLARI-583275. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, HARAPANHALLI, TQ: HARAPANHALLI, DIST: BALLARI-583131. 6. SHRUTIBAI W/O. MALLESH NAYAK, AGE: MAJOR, R/O. KANDIKERI TANDA, POST: KADATHI, TQ: HARAPANHALLI, DIST: BALLARI-583137. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1, R2 AND R5; SRI. V. SHIVRAJ HIREMATH, ADV. FOR R3; SRI. M. R. HIREMATHAD, ADV. FOR R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF PROVISIONAL LIST BEARGING NO.SUM:GB:HA.AMKA:SA.AYIKE:2019-20 DATED 13.08.2019 SO FAR KANDIKERI TANDA, AT: SL.NO.1 CANDIDATE IS CONCERNED PASSED BY R4 AND FINAL SELECTION LIST BEAIRING NO.SUM.SIAYOHA.HALLI/AUM.KA.K/ AUM.SA/ANTIM.AYKEPATTI/2019-20 DATED 11.09.2019 SO FAR KANDIKERI TANDA AT SL. NO.1 CANDIDATE IS CONCERNED PASSED BY R4 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND J RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13275 WP No. 145807 of 2020 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH /CT-AN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5