JASPREET SINGH v. SH NILKANTH S AVHAD IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/2563/2025 · 2025-09-23
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60891 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60891 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 107
Jaspreet Singh
Sh. Nilkanth S. Avhad, Water Supply and Sanitation, Punjab, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 19.3.2025 Court in CWP Punjab and others” vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “in case, the representation dated 20.08.2024 (Annexur has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of four weeks of the receipt of certified c appropriate speaking order and in case, the petitioner is found COCP-2563-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2563 of 2025
Date of decision : Jaspreet Singh Versus Sh. Nilkanth S. Avhad, IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Water Supply and Sanitation, Punjab, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Yash Pal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 19.3.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co in CWP-7515 of 2025 titled as “ Punjab and others” vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect in case, the representation dated 20.08.2024 (Annexur has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of four weeks of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order and in case, the petitioner is found
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2563 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-23.09.2025 …..Petitioner IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Water Supply and Sanitation, Punjab, Punjab Civil Secretariat, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Yash Pal Sharma, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this titled as “Jaspreet Singh vs. State of Punjab and others” vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect in case, the representation dated 20.08.2024 (Annexure P-10) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of opy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order and in case, the petitioner is found VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
entitled for grant of any relief, the same will be granted to him, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the
submits that since the order dated 19.3.2025 (Annexure P complied with by the respondents, he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition.
September Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-2563-2025 (O & M) entitled for grant of any relief, the same will be granted to him, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order.”
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order dated 19.3.2025 (Annexure P complied with by the respondents, he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. September 23, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 entitled for grant of any relief, the same will be granted to him, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner ” At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order dated 19.3.2025 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with by the respondents, he may be permitted to withdraw Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document