Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6089 (JHR)

ARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/323/2025 · 2025-07-18

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025: JHHC: 19699 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 323 of 2025 Arun Kumar age about 68 years, son of Late Durga Prasad, resident of Chirgoda Professor Colony, Street No. 3, Chirgoda, Hirapur, P.O. and P.S. Hirapur, Dist. Dhanbad … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sunil Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand at Ranchi having its office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, Advocate --- 06/18th July 2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This contempt petition has been filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against opposite party No. 2 for deliberate and intentional non- compliance of order dated 19.03.2024 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 392 of 2023. 3. A show cause has been filed during the court proceeding, which is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party has submitted that a reasoned order has been passed, though the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that appropriate order may be passed, so that the petitioner may take steps in connection with the reasoned order. 6. Considering the aforesaid submission, this court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceeding, which is hereby dropped. 7. However, liberty is reserved with the petitioner to take steps in connection with the reasoned order as may be permissible under law. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Mukul/-