IN T 111 Sagar Chan Savita Gup CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 16.12.2017 the suit for been dismis the appeal f been dismis year 2019 a been adjour Today nobo seems that t any more. January 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RSA-5194-2019 Date of decision : Chand Singla Versus a Gupta AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellant. I GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant has challenged th .2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge for recovery of Rs.1,74,000/- filed b dismissed; as well as judgment and dec peal filed by the appellant against the ju dismissed by the learned first Appellate C Order sheets show that the pr 2019 and notice in the same has not ye adjourned repeatedly on request of learn y nobody on behalf of appellant is pres s that the appellant is no more interested Dismissed for non-prosecution. 20, 2025 Asija speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH (O & M) sion :-20.01.2025 …..Appellant …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ged the judgment and decree dated Judge (Jr. Divn.) Rohtak whereby filed by the plaintiff/appellant has d decree dated 10.5.2019 whereby the judgment dated 16.12.2017 has late Court/District Judge, Rohtak. the present appeal pertains to the not yet been issued as the case has f learned counsel for the appellant. s present to pursue this appeal. It rested to pursue the present appeal tion. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.24 15.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document