Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60887 (BOM)

GULNAZ BEGAM SHAIKH AHMED AND ORS v. KHANDU DATTARAO WANKHEDE AND ANR

CA/1193/2024 · 2025-04-09

Shri Neeraj P Dhote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

927-CA-1193-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1193 OF 2024 IN FA/391/2021 Gulnaz Begam Shaikh Ahmed And Ors. ….Applicants VERSUS Khandu Dattarao Wankhede And Anr. ..Respondents ….. Mr. Kulkarni Ashutosh S., Advocate for Applicants Mr. K. B. Jadhav h/f Mr. R. B. Narwade, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. S. S. Sarda h/f Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 09.04.2025 PER COURT : 1. This is an Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of Deceased, who died in the motor vehicular accident. 2. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 and the learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 3. The Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 09/12/2019, passed by the learned Tribunal, Nanded, in Motor Accident Claim Petition [MACP] No.359/2016, which came to be dismissed vide Order dated 09/12/2019. During the pendency of the said Claim Petition, Original Claimant No.1 – Gulnaz Begum 1 2025:BHC-AUG:10820 927-CA-1193-2024.odt Shaikh Ahmed, who was the widow of Deceased, was pregnant and delivered a baby. The Application is to bring on record the name of the said girl child born from the wedlock between the Deceased and Original Claimant No.1. 4. There can be no impediment if the Application is allowed. Hence, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clauses - ‘A’ and ‘B’. The necessary amendment be carried out within a period of [2] weeks. A copy of amended Claim Petition be served on the learned Advocate for the Respondents. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/April-2025 2 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/04/2025 12:01:44