M/S TARSEM KUMAR CONTRACTOR v. AMRITSAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS
CWP/14636/2025 · 2025-05-26
Lisa Gill, Sudeepti Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60870 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60870 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
174
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CWP-14636-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.05.2025
Tarsem Kumar Contractor
....Petitioner VERSUS Amritsar Development Authority and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present:- Mr. Birinder Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S.Khosla, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Yogender Verma, Advocate for respondent No.1
Mr. Kuljit Singh Bal, Advocate for respondent No.4.
-.-
LISA GILL, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in present writ petition is for quashing of Tender–cum– Auction dated 03.09.2024 issued by respondent No.3 as the same was allegedly conducted in a completely arbitrary manner, ignoring all terms and conditions as well as eligibility criteria mentioned in the Auction Notice and RFP Guidelines, for the sole purpose of preventing participation of Petitioner in the tender process.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1, submits that petitioner no longer remains disqualified. He has been permitted to participate in the tender process, therefore, this petition is rendered infructuous.
TRIPTI SAINI 2025.06.03 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-14636-2025 (O&M)
-2-
3.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that question of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 being disqualified has not been addressed by the respondents till date.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1, responds by submitting that objections as raised by petitioner in respect to eligibility of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall be decided within one week from today and definitely before the bidding process, by way of speaking order.
5.
In view of above, no further orders are called for in this writ petition, which is disposed of accordingly.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
May 26, 2025
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2025.06.03 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document