1 2025:CGHC:998 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 230 of 2018 1 - Suresh Kumar Adwani & Others S/o Ram Kumar Adwani Aged About 48 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Chakarbhata Camp, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Naresh Kumar Adwani S/o Ratan Kumar Adwani Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Chakarbhata Camp, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Kishore Kumar Adwani S/o Ratan Kumar Adwani Aged About 36 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Chakarbhata Camp, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shubham Adwani S/o Suresh Kumar Adwani Aged About 20 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Chakarbhata Camp, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pratap Rai Panjwani & Another S/o Pewachand Panjawani Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Chakarbhata Camp, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.08 20:37:42 +0530 2 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 07.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. Ankita Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No.2/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following prayer: “It is therefore, humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quashed the order passed by both the order of learned lower court below in the interest of Justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has become infructuous as the trial has concluded and they have been convicted. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/ Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Akhil