Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60865 (CHH)

SUNIL EKKA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4622/2023 · 2025-12-08

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:59833 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4622 of 2023 1 - Sunil Ekka Son Of Late Shri Dalganjan Ram Aged About 22 Years Resident Of Cillage- Podikhurd, Post- Bhitthikala, Police Station - Darima, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Director Panchayat Chhattisgarh Ground Floor, Vikas Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Education Officer Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 6 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 5 & 6 : Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/12/2025 1. None appears for the petitioner to argue the case even in second round, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat