1 2025:CGHC:59050-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6354 of 2025 M/s Vanya Landscaping And Horticulture Solutions (P) Ltd. Through Its One Of The Directors Deepak Tyagi, S/o Late C.R. Tyagi, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Flat No. 103, Block-B, Ashoka Ratan, Raipur, Having Registered OfÏce Address At OfÏce No. 313, 3rd Floor, Housing Board Complex, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry Of Department Of Energy, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capitol Complex, Nawa Raipur (Atal Nagar), Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency (CREDA) Through Its Chairman, V I P Road, Near Energy Educational Park, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer CREDA, Head OfÏce, Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer CREDA, Head OfÏce, Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer CREDA, Zonal OfÏce, Durg Chhattisgarh 6 - District In-Charge CREDA, District Administrative OfÏce, Chhattisgarh SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.12.06 11:45:43 +0530 2 ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respective Respondents : Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Advocate and Ms. Akriti Singh, Advocate appeared through VC Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 05.12.2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “10.1 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue calling the relevant records from the court below pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal. 10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue direction the respondent authorities to expeditiously decide the application/reminder dated 10.10.2025 pending before the respondent authority and further direct the respondent authorities to clear the petitioner's pending bill. 10.3 Cost of the proceedings. 10.4 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of case.” 3 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of its grievance. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar