Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60852 (PNJ)

SUSHIL SACHDEVA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/30818/2024 · 2025-02-13

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-30818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (202-2) Sushil Sachdeva State of Punjab CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN 1. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case 02.04.2024, under Sections 409, 420 read with Section 120 Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sahib. 2. Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. 3. petitioner has longer required. 30818-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sushil Sachdeva Versus Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Deepali Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case 02.04.2024, under Sections 409, 420 read with Section 120 Penal Code, registered at Police Station Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Vide order dated 01.07.2024, Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. Learned State counsel on instructions has joined the investigation and his longer required. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30818-2024 Date of Decision:-13.02.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN Ishan Gupta, Advocate and for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 0031 dated 02.04.2024, under Sections 409, 420 read with Section 120-B of Indian Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the on instructions, submits that the his custodial interrogation is no - 2024 13.02.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondent The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. FIR No. 0031 dated B of Indian Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar of this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the that the custodial interrogation is no PARUL 2025.02.14 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-30818 4. dated 01.07 made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency the conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. 5. expression of opinion on the merits of the case construed as parity 6. any such activity once again, the present concession grante automatically stand vacated February 13, 2025 Parul 30818-2024 In light of the above, the present 01.07.2024 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency the conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a fina expression of opinion on the merits of the case construed as parity qua any other co-accused It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in any such activity once again, the present concession grante automatically stand vacated. February 13, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- -2- present petition is allowed. The order granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency, and shall abide by However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case and this order shall not be accused. It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in any such activity once again, the present concession granted shall (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No - petition is allowed. The order is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and and shall abide by l this order shall not be It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in d shall PARUL 2025.02.14 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document