HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5282 of 2022 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Syed Fahim Ahmed, learned counsel for revisionist, Sri Pushkar Mehrotra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned AGA for the State. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for revisionist submits, the instant revision has been filed by the husband of opposite party no.2 against the interim maintenance order passed by the court concerned but now matter between husband and wife has been amicably settled, therefore, revisionist does not want to press the instant revision, therefore, instant revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.2 are having no objection. 4. In view of contention raised at bar, the instant revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall accordingly stands disposed off. September 25, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Bala Nath Mishra, Ram Vishal Mishra, Sachin Mishra, Syed Fahim Ahmed Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ankur Singh, G.A., Pushkar Mehrotra (Sameer Jain,J.) Akshay Garg .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad