Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6083 (RAJ)

VEDRAM S/O SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2211/2025 · 2025-02-11

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5879] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2211/2025 Vedram S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Naharauli, Post Shishwada, Teshil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director General Of Police, Through Its Home Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Inspector General Of Police, Kota Range, Kota (Raj.) 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Baran District Baran (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Bajrang Sepat for Ms.Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr.Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr.Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/02/2025 1. Petitioner herein seek a direction to the respondents to give notional benefits, pay-fixation, seniority to him from the date of appointment as has been given to his counter-parts. 2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order dated 17.12.2012 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11973/2012 : Dara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits that the petitioner is sanguine that, in case he is allowed to file a [2025:RJ-JP:5879] (2 of 2) [CW-2211/2025] representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ petition and the same is considered in light of the aforesaid judgment, he will be meted out with favorable treatment. 3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Dara Singh (supra), as expeditiously as possible. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /11