1 2025:CGHC:59373 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6372 of 2025 1 - Santosh Joshi S/o Mr. Arjun Joshi, Aged About 40 Years R/o Shivnagar, Kanker, Tehsil Kanker, Dist. North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Division Bastar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 3 - Collector Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Tehsildar, Kanker, Tehsil Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 08/12/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue commanding and directing the respondent authorities to produce entire records pertaining to the case, before this Hon’ble Court. 2 10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue quashing the impugned order dated 17.11.2025 (Annexure P/1) to the extent of rejection of stay application as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of fundamental and constitutional rights of the petitioner herein and further for the reason that the same is against the principles of natural justice and in effect further pleased to allow the application for grant of stay. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.4 Cost of the petition may also be awarded” 2. This writ petition is filed against the interim order dated 17.11.2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Commissioner, Bastar Division rejecting the application for grant of interim relief. According to the provisions under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 petitioner is having alternate efficacious remedy of filing a revision and therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. 3. Therefore, in view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy available under the law. Registry is directed to return back the certified copies of the documents enclosed along with the writ petition after retaining photocopies of the same. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY